Most law firms we talk to aren't short of dashboards or tools - they're short of an hour back in the week. That's the lens we put on web design and build: not a tech showcase, but a careful look at the one or two workflows where a law firm is paying for the same problem to be solved twice.
Law firms-grade web design and build, shipped by people who've done it before.
Our goal is to give law firms a three-day weekend, so people can spend more time with their families and the people they love :)
What web design and build actually does
Sites built to convert the traffic you already pay for, fast on the phone your buyer is actually holding, and editable by your team afterwards. Structure is usually what costs you the conversions, so that is where the work starts.
- 01 Conversion focused wireframes signed off before design
- 02 Build on a stack you can host cheaply and edit safely
- 03 Analytics and lead routing wired in from day one
- 04 Performance budget enforced at launch and after
Built on: Astro Cloudflare Pages Figma Claude Plausible
What you actually get
Every engagement is scoped and quoted up front. This is what is in the box.
- A working pilot, in productionNot a prototype on someone's laptop. The first slice of web design and build runs against real work within weeks.
- Your data stays yoursIt runs on your accounts and your tools. If we part ways you keep the system and everything in it.
- The workflow mapped before codeWe write down what good looks like for law firms first, so nobody is guessing at handover.
- Support after it landsThe people who built it stay reachable when the business changes shape around it.
How web design and build compares
The two things most businesses do instead, and where each one runs out.
| Hiring for it | An off-the-shelf tool | Kiwi Dynamics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fit to how you work | Fits perfectly, costs a salary | You bend your process to suit the tool | Built around the workflow you already run |
| Time to something useful | Immediate, and permanent | Quick to switch on, slow to make fit | A working slice in weeks, then hardened |
| Who owns the data | You do | The vendor, on the vendor's terms | You do, in your own accounts |
| When it breaks | That person sorts it, if they are in | A support queue and a ticket number | The people who built it |
| What it costs | A salary, every year, forever | Per seat, forever, used or not | Scoped and quoted up front |
The shape of every law firm brief we've seen.
- Law firms bill for judgement, but a huge share of the week still goes on intake, document review, and status updates.
- New matter intake and routine client updates are the two places firms lose the most billable time to admin.
How we build web design and build for law firms.
We scope narrow, ship a working pilot, then harden it into production. The first slice is the highest-leverage workflow for a law firm business, so value lands before the build is finished. Sites built to convert.
Talk to usHow the work runs
- Find the one workflowWe look for the job costing law firms the most hours or the most leads, and deliberately ignore the rest for now.
- Ship a working sliceA narrow version goes into production in weeks, against real work, so the value shows up before the build is finished.
- Prove it, then widenWe measure it against what the work cost before. If it does not pay for itself, we say so rather than scaling it.
- Harden and hand overLogging, fallbacks and a real handover, so it keeps running when we are not in the room.
The outcome for law firms
We'd call the engagement a success when law firms are using the system without thinking about us. The repository is yours, and hosting stays in your account.
Not your typical AI agency.
Honest about what AI can and cannot do
Ships the one workflow that pays for itself
Hours given back, never the size of the invoice
*Every engagement is scoped and quoted up front. Results vary by workflow and business.
FAQ
How fast could we have web design and build in production?
Eight to ten weeks for most law firms. Faster if your data is in good shape and slower if we're untangling a legacy integration first. We'll give you a realistic number on the scoping call rather than the optimistic one.
What's the smallest engagement you'd take on?
A two-week paid discovery for law firms that aren't sure whether the build is worth doing at all. You get a one-page write-up of what we'd build, what we'd skip, and what it would cost. About 30% of those discoveries end with us recommending you don't proceed.
Anyone else in this space using web design and build?
Plenty. The repository is yours, and hosting stays in your account. The interesting question is rarely "does it work" - it's "is your team ready to use the output." That's what we'd scope on the call.
What if our law firm doesn't have any data ready?
Most don't. Getting the data into shape - ingestion, cleaning, the lightweight contracts you need before any model is useful - is part of the engagement. For web design and build specifically, we typically run that work on Astro, Cloudflare Pages, Figma, Claude, Plausible and assume messy starting conditions from day one.
One short call.
Tell us what you're trying to fix. We'll come back inside a working day.
Talk to us about this
Tell us what you're trying to do and we'll reply with how we'd build it - no obligation.