Accounting firms are some of the most efficient operators in New Zealand - which means the easy wins from MCP integrations are usually already taken. The brief we accept is the one focused on the workflow you've tried to fix twice and given up on.
Built for the accounting firm who's already tried the off-the-shelf option and bounced off it.
Our goal is to give accounting firms a three-day weekend, so people can spend more time with their families and the people they love :)
What MCP integrations actually does
Wire Claude, ChatGPT, or Gemini directly into your tools with the Model Context Protocol. Your team uses AI in their existing inbox, CRM, or chat - with your data, your permissions, your guardrails.
- 01 Custom MCP servers for your CRM, ERP, or in-house tools
- 02 Permission-aware so AI only sees what each user can
- 03 Tool-call audit log for compliance
- 04 Works with Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, Cursor, and more
Built on: MCP Claude TypeScript Vercel
Without Kiwi Dynamics
With Kiwi Dynamics
What you actually get
Every engagement is scoped and quoted up front. This is what is in the box.
- A working pilot, in productionNot a prototype on someone's laptop. The first slice of MCP integrations runs against real work within weeks.
- Your data stays yoursIt runs on your accounts and your tools. If we part ways you keep the system and everything in it.
- The workflow mapped before codeWe write down what good looks like for accounting firms first, so nobody is guessing at handover.
- Support after it landsThe people who built it stay reachable when the business changes shape around it.
How MCP integrations compares
The two things most businesses do instead, and where each one runs out.
| Hiring for it | An off-the-shelf tool | Kiwi Dynamics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fit to how you work | Fits perfectly, costs a salary | You bend your process to suit the tool | Built around the workflow you already run |
| Time to something useful | Immediate, and permanent | Quick to switch on, slow to make fit | A working slice in weeks, then hardened |
| Who owns the data | You do | The vendor, on the vendor's terms | You do, in your own accounts |
| When it breaks | That person sorts it, if they are in | A support queue and a ticket number | The people who built it |
| What it costs | A salary, every year, forever | Per seat, forever, used or not | Scoped and quoted up front |
Where accounting firms actually lose hours and dollars.
- Accounting firms carry seasonal peaks where document chasing and data entry crowd out the advisory work that actually pays.
- Client document requests, reconciliations, and deadline reminders are the repetitive load behind every busy season.
How we build MCP integrations for accounting firms.
We scope narrow, ship a working pilot, then harden it into production. The first slice is the highest-leverage workflow for an accounting firm business, so value lands before the build is finished. Connect Claude to your stack.
Talk to usHow the work runs
- Find the one workflowWe look for the job costing accounting firms the most hours or the most leads, and deliberately ignore the rest for now.
- Ship a working sliceA narrow version goes into production in weeks, against real work, so the value shows up before the build is finished.
- Prove it, then widenWe measure it against what the work cost before. If it does not pay for itself, we say so rather than scaling it.
- Harden and hand overLogging, fallbacks and a real handover, so it keeps running when we are not in the room.
The outcome for accounting firms
Existing AI tools become 10x more useful with real business context. For accounting firms, that almost always shows up as fewer interruptions and a calmer week, not a dashboard chart.
Not your typical AI agency.
Honest about what AI can and cannot do
Ships the one workflow that pays for itself
Hours given back, never the size of the invoice
*Every engagement is scoped and quoted up front. Results vary by workflow and business.
FAQ
How quickly can we see something running?
Week three for a clickable internal demo against real data. Week six for a slice your team can actually use. We hold ourselves to those numbers because they're what stops a project drifting into "endless discovery".
What's the smallest engagement you'd take on?
A two-week paid discovery for accounting firms that aren't sure whether the build is worth doing at all. You get a one-page write-up of what we'd build, what we'd skip, and what it would cost. About 30% of those discoveries end with us recommending you don't proceed.
Has this actually shipped for a real accounting firm?
Yes. Existing AI tools become 10x more useful with real business context. We'll share comparable engagements on the call.
What tools do you build MCP integrations on?
For MCP integrations we usually reach for MCP, Claude, TypeScript, Vercel. We're tool-agnostic at heart - we pick what your accounting firm team can actually run after we hand the build over, not what looks good on a vendor sticker.
One short call.
Tell us what you're trying to fix. We'll come back inside a working day.
Talk to us about this
Tell us what you're trying to do and we'll reply with how we'd build it - no obligation.