Building companies · Applied AI

AI for paperwork, built around how a building company actually works.

There is a version of AI document processing that building companies buy off a shelf and quietly stop using inside a month. Then there's the version that's wired into your real workflow, owned by a person on your team, and still in use a year later. We only build the second one.

What AI document processing actually does

Scanned invoices, signed contracts, handwritten timesheets, PDF specs – extracted into clean data and routed where they belong. No more typing what someone already wrote.

  • 01 Vision models read scans, photos, and handwriting
  • 02 Pushes structured data into Xero, your CRM, or sheets
  • 03 Confidence flags route low-certainty docs to a human
  • 04 Handles te reo, bilingual forms, and old NZ templates

Built on: Claude Vision AWS Textract Mistral OCR Vercel

The honest read

Where most building companies engagements actually deliver value.

  • Builders run multiple sites at once, and the paperwork behind each one grows faster than anyone has time to manage.
  • Variations, supplier orders, and client updates are the admin layer that determines whether a build stays on schedule.
Talk to us about this →

How we build AI document processing for building companies.

We scope narrow, ship a working pilot, then harden it into production. The first slice is the highest-leverage workflow for a building company business, so value lands before the build is finished. AI for paperwork.

Talk to us

The outcome for building companies

The shape of the result for building companies: Cuts data-entry labour by 80% on invoices, POs, and timesheets. Built on Claude Vision, hardened with the rest of the stack as it scales.

Not your typical AI agency.

Honest about what AI can and cannot do

Ships the one workflow that pays for itself

Hours given back, never the size of the invoice

Start a conversation

*Every engagement is scoped and quoted up front. Results vary by workflow and business.

How much is not automating costing you?

Nine hours a week of admin is 468 hours a year. With Kiwi Dynamics, that drops to about 52.

Try the calculator

*Based on 9 hours a week of admin at Kiwi Dynamics' typical 80% automation rate. Your number may vary, the calculator uses your own.

Questions

FAQ

What's a typical engagement length for building companies?

Six to twelve weeks for the build, then a short managed-services month while the system goes from "shipped" to "owned by your team". After that you keep us on retainer if you want, or take it from there yourself.

Are there hidden costs we should plan for?

Three to know about: model/API spend (which we set up under your own account, not ours, so you see and control it), any new SaaS subscriptions we recommend, and your team's time during rollout. We surface all three in the quote so there are no surprises.

Anyone else in this space using AI document processing?

Plenty. Cuts data-entry labour by 80% on invoices, POs, and timesheets. The interesting question is rarely "does it work" – it's "is your team ready to use the output." That's what we'd scope on the call.

Can you work with our existing systems?

Yes. The default AI document processing stack we reach for is Claude Vision, AWS Textract, Mistral OCR, Vercel, but we'll bend it around whatever you already run – Xero, HubSpot, Shopify, Cin7, your own in-house apps. The discovery week maps every data source before any build starts.

Worth a conversation?

Even if you don't end up working with us, you'll leave the call knowing what's worth building.

Get in touch

Talk to us about this

Tell us what you're trying to do and we'll reply with how we'd build it — no obligation.