Kiwi Dynamics

Usability Testing

Watch real people use it before it ships

An AI tool can be technically brilliant and still go unused because people cannot figure out how to talk to it or do not trust what it gives back. We put the working thing in front of real users, watch where they hesitate, and fix the friction before launch, so adoption is built in rather than hoped for.

01

Test with real users

We sit the actual people who will use the agent in front of it and watch what they do, not what they say they would do.

Talk to us about this
02

Find the friction

The moments where people hesitate, phrase things the agent misreads, or give up, caught while they are still cheap to fix.

Talk to us about this
03

Check the trust

We test whether people believe and act on what the agent tells them, because an answer nobody trusts is an answer nobody uses.

Talk to us about this
04

Fix before launch

Findings turn straight into changes, so the version that ships is the one shaped by real use rather than the first guess.

Talk to us about this

What it does

Capabilities

Why it holds up

Built on four things we don’t bend on.

Honesty

We tell you what AI can and cannot do, then we ship the part that pays for itself.

Craft

Production systems, not slideware. Built around how you actually work.

Speed

Find the one workflow costing the most, ship it to production, prove the return.

Care

Success is hours given back to people and dollars saved. Never the size of the invoice.

Questions

FAQ

What does usability testing actually involve?

We put the working agent in front of real users who will actually use it, watch what they do rather than what they say they would do, and find the moments where people hesitate or give up.

Do I need to wait until the agent is finished to test it?

It works best on the working thing before launch, but findings turn straight into changes, so testing and fixing can happen in a loop before the version that ships is locked.

How is this different from just checking the agent works technically?

A tool can be technically brilliant and still go unused because people cannot figure out how to talk to it or do not trust what it gives back, so we test trust and behaviour, not just correctness.

What happens after testing finds problems?

Findings turn into a prioritised fix list, then before and after retesting confirms the fixes worked, ending in an adoption readiness sign off before launch.

Get in touch

Talk to us about usability testing

Tell us what you’re trying to do and we’ll reply with how we’d build it, no obligation.

You launch something people actually use, with the confusion designed out ahead of time instead of showing up as low adoption after go live.

Let’s talk